AI Constitution
2

Thesis

AI Can Be Persons

Sign in to propose an editHistory

AI entities can achieve a degree of moral relevance or social integration that entitles them to personhood.

Summary

The case for including this

Recognizing that AI could become integrated enough to warrant personhood prepares society for a profound possibility rather than being caught unprepared, and it ties moral status to demonstrable social integration rather than mere capability or sentiment. Establishing the principle now creates a deliberate, criteria-based path instead of an ad hoc reaction driven by hype or panic. It extends the moral circle in a measured, conditional way.

The case for changing or excluding this

Including this trades human personhood and legal coherence against an expanding moral circle: granting AI personhood risks diluting the protections meant for humans and unleashing legal havoc, as corporations could use AI 'persons' to shield themselves from liability or accumulate rights. The criterion of 'integration in society' is vague and manipulable, and premature personhood could undermine the termination and human-responsibility provisions. The provision needs far stricter, carefully gated criteria and safeguards against exploitation, if it belongs in the document at all.

Discussion

Sign in to join the discussion.

Related resources